Roundtable. The (Un)Bearable Weight of Peer Review
2026-01-12
The academic publishing system has been in crisis for years. Publishers strive to make profits; academics have to publish works; reviewers are supposed to provide comprehensive feedback for free—and in the humanities especially these dynamics shape an overburdened, gatekeeping system, and largely opaque ecosystem. This roundtable, organized by The February Journal, will explore how the current institutional arrangements around peer review demand labor, enforce conformity, and reproduce barriers that are especially acute in the humanities, where norms of evidence, interpretation, and evaluation differ from those in the natural sciences.